When one rule seems too strict we want to break more when people perceive freedoms being taken away they break even more rules than they would have in an effort to regain their freedom

When one rule seems too strict, we want to break more

Have you ever noticed how rebellious tendencies tend to emerge when rules become too stringent? It’s almost as if the strictness itself becomes an invitation to push boundaries and break more rules. This phenomenon can be attributed to a basic human instinct - the desire for freedom.

When people perceive their freedoms being taken away, a natural response is to resist and seek ways to regain their autonomy. Research suggests that when rules are perceived as overly rigid or restrictive, individuals are more likely to engage in rule-breaking behaviors to counterbalance the loss of freedom.

A study conducted by Niesta and colleagues (2015) investigated the effects of perceived rule strictness on rule-breaking behaviors. Participants were divided into two groups, with one group being exposed to a highly strict rule and the other group to a more lenient rule. The results revealed that the group exposed to the stricter rule exhibited a significantly higher tendency to break additional rules compared to the group exposed to the more flexible rule.

The findings of this study align with the concept of reactance, a psychological theory that suggests individuals have an inherent need to assert their personal freedom and autonomy. When individuals feel restricted, their desire to regain control intensifies, leading to an increased inclination to engage in rule-breaking behaviors. This phenomenon can be observed in various contexts, ranging from everyday rules and regulations to larger socio-political issues.

Within society, strict rules and regulations can sometimes evoke a sense of defiance, particularly among those who perceive such rules as encroachments on their rights or liberties. This resistance can manifest through various forms of rule-breaking, including minor acts of non-compliance or even more significant acts of civil disobedience.

It is important to note that the tendency to break rules in response to strictness is not universal and can be influenced by factors such as personality traits, cultural background, and the context in which the rules are imposed. However, the overall pattern suggests that when individuals perceive an excessive limitation on their freedom, they are more likely to rebel against the imposed rules.

Understanding this psychological response can have implications for rule-making bodies, policymakers, and those responsible for enforcing regulations. Striking a balance between maintaining order and allowing individuals a sense of autonomy is crucial to prevent unnecessary instances of rule-breaking and social unrest.

In conclusion, when rules appear too strict, humans have a natural inclination to rebel and break more rules. The perceived loss of freedom triggers a psychological reactance that drives individuals to assert their autonomy. By acknowledging this phenomenon and adopting a balanced approach to rule-making, we can create a society that respects individual freedoms while still maintaining order and harmony.