If we had the same mortality rate now as in 1900 more than half the people in the world today would not be alive

If we had the same mortality rate now as in 1900, more than half the people in the world today would not be alive.

It’s hard to imagine a world where more than half the people alive today would not exist. Yet, if we had the same mortality rate as in 1900, this would be our reality.

In the early 20th century, life expectancy was significantly lower compared to the present day. People faced higher risks of infectious diseases, lacked access to proper healthcare, and lived in conditions that were less conducive to a long and healthy life. The mortality rate was much higher, with a considerable number of infants and young children dying from preventable causes.

Thanks to advancements in medicine, improved living conditions, and better education, life expectancy has increased dramatically over the past century. Today, the global average life expectancy is around 73 years, compared to just 31 years in 1900. This tremendous progress has resulted in a world population that is more than seven times larger than it was at the beginning of the 20th century.

If we were to roll back the clock and place ourselves in the mortality conditions of 1900, the consequences would be staggering. With a current estimated global population of over 7.9 billion people, more than half would not have survived past infancy or early childhood. The economic, social, and cultural impact of such a substantial reduction in population would be profound.

This reality highlights the importance of sustained efforts to improve healthcare systems, promote disease prevention, and enhance living conditions worldwide. By continuing to invest in medical research, healthcare infrastructure, and education, we can ensure that future generations have the opportunity to lead longer and healthier lives.

Sources: Our World in Data - Life Expectancy